Prediction of Caroma Winn vs Mrs Nathaniel Dain Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Wojtek Kolan

HEAD TO HEAD

C. Winn vs M. Nathaniel Dain

Caroma Winn
Caroma Winn

Flag USA USA

l
l
l
l
l
w
l
l
l
l
Mrs Nathaniel Dain
Mrs Nathaniel Dain

Flag USA USA

l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l

0

Win

0

Played

0

Win

0
Age
0
-
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Head-to-head: Winn 0 - 0 Dain

They have played 2 sets in total, with Caroma Winn winning 2 and Mrs Nathaniel Dain winning 0. The last match between Caroma Winn and Mrs Nathaniel Dain was at the Montclair, 31-05-1920, Round: R4, Surface: N/A, with Caroma Winn getting the victory 6-1 6-3.

PlayersHead To Head Match Wins
Winn0
Dain0
Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R4Montclair(05-31-20)

N/A
USA Flag
Caroma Winn
6
6
USA Flag
Mrs Nathaniel Dain
1
3

C. Winn vs M. N. Dain H2H Profile

Stats
$0Career Prize Money$0
43.97% (62-79)Career Total W/L15.63% (5-27)
0% (0-0)YTD Win/Loss0% (0-0)

C. Winn vs M. N. Dain Match Preview:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Caroma Winn has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Mrs Nathaniel Dain has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Caroma Winn, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Mrs Nathaniel Dain has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Caroma Winn has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mrs Nathaniel Dain has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Caroma Winn has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Mrs Nathaniel Dain winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Caroma Winn has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 7/7), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 21% (W/L 7/27). Mrs Nathaniel Dain has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 1/2), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/8).
  • Player level: In the last year, Caroma Winn has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Mrs Nathaniel Dain has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Caroma Winn winning 1 times and Mrs Nathaniel Dain being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Caroma Winn winning 2 and Mrs Nathaniel Dain winning 0.
  • The last match between Caroma Winn and Mrs Nathaniel Dain was at the Montclair, 31-05-1920, Round: R4, Surface: N/A, with Caroma Winn getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Caroma Winn has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Mrs Nathaniel Dain has played against players with an average rank of 0.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Caroma Winn has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mrs Nathaniel Dain has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Caroma Winn has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mrs Nathaniel Dain has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Caroma Winn vs Mrs Nathaniel Dain Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

C. Winn vs M. N. Dain H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Stats
1H2H Matches Won0
2Sets Won0
12Games Won4
0:0:0Average Match Time0:0:0
100% (1/1)Best‑of‑3 Win %0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)1st Set Won, Won Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)1st Set Won, Lost Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)1st Set Lost, Won Match0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

2nd Serve Win %: Winn 0%, Dain 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Winn 0%, Dain 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Winn 0%, Dain 0%.

C. Winn Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
N/ABronxville - 12-09-1932

R2

USAS. Dillon
L
W/O
GrassRye Apawamis - 22-06-1930

R2

N/AU. Player
L
6-1 6-1
GrassGlen Head - 01-07-1929

R3

USAA. Francis
L
6-0 6-0
N/AWestfield State - 19-06-1929

R3

USAM. Arthur
W
0-6 6-4 6-4

R4

USAA. Ayers
L
UNK

M. N. Dain Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
ClayUniversity Heights - 23-06-1924

R3

USAV. Rogers
L
W/O
N/AMontclair - 19-05-1924

R3

USAM. S
L
6-0 6-0
N/AArdsley-on-Hudson - 16-09-1923

R3

USAM. Franklin
L
6-0 6-0
GrassCedarhurst - 27-08-1923

R3

USAR. Newton
L
6-0 6-1
GrassRye State - 23-07-1923

R2

USAH. Wills
L
6-0 6-0
banner

C. Winn vs M. N. Dain Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Stats
43.97% (62/79)YTD Win/Loss15.63% (5/27)
44.06% (126/160)Sets Win/Loss21.31% (13/48)
45.23% (1095/1326)Games Win/Loss31.97% (164/349)
50.00% (7/7)Clay Win/Loss33.33% (1/2)
57.14% (20/15)Indoor Hard W/L33.33% (1/2)
20.59% (7/27)Grass Win/Loss0.00% (0/8)
1st MatchAverage Match Time1st Match
0.00% (0/8)Slam W/L0.00% (0/1)
44% (57/129)Best of 3 Sets Win %18% (5/28)
57% (16/28)Deciding Set Win %40% (2/5)
94% (50/47)1st Set Won, Won Match60% (5/3)
6% (50/3)1st Set Won, Lost Match40% (5/2)
13% (79/10)1st Set Lost, Won Match9% (23/2)

Other Tennis Predictions Today

10:35 AM 20/11/25
Prediction
GBRM. Carrollq
ITAL. Rossi2
W1
3.96
W2
1.197
06:30 PM 20/11/25
Prediction
BOLJ. C. P. Angelo5
BRAB. FernandezWC
W1
1.094
W2
5.75
12:00 PM 20/11/25
Prediction
NEDJ. Sels6
GERJ. Opitzq
W1
1.176
W2
4.25
10:00 PM 20/11/25
Prediction
ESTM. Lajal7
GERJ. Engel
W1
1.7
W2
2.01
12:00 PM 21/11/25
Prediction
GBRJ. Clarke1
MDAR. Albot
W1
1.58
W2
2.2
02:30 PM 20/11/25
Prediction
ROUC. Cretuq
ARGM. Trungelliti2
W1
2.46
W2
1.47